top of page
Search

What do people really want when they confront their last moments? For some patients, it may mean maintaining their own medical autonomy. For others, it may mean having family closely involved, continuing treatment for as long as possible, or following religious and cultural traditions. This then raises an important ethical question for hospice care: physicians must have an understanding of their patients’ cultural background to provide the best end-of-life care.


Patients from many backgrounds may have differing opinions on illness and death. According to the American Psychological Association (APA), “culture contributes to differences in attitudes, preferences, behaviors, perceptions and experiences related to palliative and end-of-life care” [1]. These differences can affect everything from how patients experience pain to whether they are comfortable discussing death. 


In some cultures, conversations about death may be considered inappropriate or even harmful. In an interview, Dr. Liberman, executive director of Northwell Health’s Hospice Care Network, explains that death can be a taboo subject in some communities. She describes how, in her Jamaican culture, hospice can be associated with “giving up” on a loved one, while some South African beliefs hold that speaking about death can cause it to happen sooner [2]. She also says, “Japanese and Iranian cultures may also avoid direct discussions about death altogether” [2]. Furthermore, some patients may have the belief that the timing of death should be determined by God rather than by physicians [2]. These beliefs can create misunderstanding or mistrust between patients, families, and healthcare providers and should be addressed in hospice care.


Culture also influences medical decision-making. A study comparing older adults in the United States and South Korea found that Americans often use advance care planning to preserve individual autonomy, while Korean older adults may prefer delegating decisions to their adult children [3]. Neither approach is inherently more ethical, but they are simply different. For some patients, autonomy means making decisions independently, while for others, it means involving family members.


These cultural differences matter because they can contribute to differences in how people use end-of-life care. Research among Medicare beneficiaries with dementia has found differences in hospice use, hospitalizations, and treatment preferences across racial and ethnic groups [4]. The APA similarly notes that some racial and ethnic minority groups, including African Americans, Latinx individuals, and Asians, may prefer more aggressive treatment at the end of life [1]. These differences highlight the importance of recognizing how culture can affect end-of-life decisions. Without culturally sensitive communication, healthcare providers may fail to adequately address a patient’s concerns with hospice care.

Ultimately, physicians must ask more profound questions about their patients to understand their culture and values that may be influenced by their background. What does hospice care mean to the patient? Who should retain autonomy in making medical decisions? What beliefs or concerns shape a patient’s preferences? By having these conversations and being culturally sensitive, providers can address misconceptions while still respecting patient values. 


There is no universal definition of a “good” death. To different people with different backgrounds and cultures, it may mean different things. Ethical hospice care means creating spaces for these differences and tailoring treatment to have a patient’s best interest in mind. 


Designed by: Michele Sun Reviewed by: Maddie Parr


References 

[1] American Psychological Association. (2010). Culturally Diverse Communities and Palliative and End-of-life care. https://www.apa.org/pi/aging/programs/eol/end-of-life-diversity.

[2] Northwell Health. (2022) Understanding Cultural Barriers to Hospice. 

[3] Ha, J.-H., Lee, C., & Yoo, J. (2023). Cultural Differences in Advance Care Planning and Implications for Practice. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 87(3), 838-855. https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228211029502.

[4] Lin P, Zhu Y, Olchanski N, et al. (2022). Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hospice Use and Hospitalizations at End-of-Life Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia. JAMA Network Open, 5(6), e2216260. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16260.

[2] Mwai, Grace W., et al. "Role and outcomes of community health workers in HIV care in sub‐Saharan Africa: a systematic review." Journal of the International AIDS Society 16.1 (2013): 18586. 

[3] Mermin, Jonathan, et al. "Mortality in HIV-infected Ugandan adults receiving antiretroviral treatment and survival of their HIV-uninfected children: a prospective cohort study." The Lancet 371.9614 (2008): 752-759. 

[4] Ngcobo, Sanele, et al. "Roles, barriers, and recommendations for community health workers providing community-based HIV Care in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review." AIDS Patient Care and STDs 36.4 (2022): 130-144. 

[5] Abdullateef, Ridwanullah Olamide, et al. "Community health workers’ commitment to HIV/AIDS control in Africa." Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health 2 (2024): 100036.


 
 
 

One of the most prevalent public health challenges affecting people worldwide today is HIV, human immunodeficiency virus. HIV remains a huge global health obstacle, specifically in Sub-Saharan Africa, where 67% of all 38.4 million people affected by HIV come from [1]. While HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Global South continues to impact the overall quality of life in these regions, numerous measures are being taken to help improve HIV as a global health emergency. 


Specifically, a community-based approach has been taken. Community-based healthcare focuses on local prevention of a public health challenge, where community health workers, typically volunteers, provide medical services and education and administer prevention programs in specific areas. A 21-trial study found that 9 of the 21 trials reported that community health workers educated families and primary healthcare workers in countries like Kenya and Uganda on HIV treatment [2]. They were also responsible for training patients who were HIV-positive on the use of ARV (Antiretroviral therapy) treatment, so that they could easily administer it themselves or provide it to an individual who is HIV-positive in the future.

In addition, an early 2000s Uganda study conducted a community-based ARV program that was able to produce a 95% reduction in mortality of HIV-affected Ugandans, as well as an 81% reduction in mortality among the HIV-negative dependent children of said patients [3]. The program used community health workers trained for 4-6 weeks beforehand to deliver ARV treatment to patients’ homes, refer patients to clinics, and monitor adherence through regular community meetings. The Sub-Saharan African region receives significantly less care in comparison to other parts of the world; community-based healthcare and volunteer healthcare workers have made it possible for the region to receive the HIV treatment(s) it deserves.


On the other hand, critics of the community-based healthcare system and community health workers claim that the system does not adequately prepare its workers to deal with the true severity of HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa. Community health workers often lack sufficient funding to care for patients effectively and efficiently. Many are not provided with basic equipment like gloves, masks, and educational materials, do not receive sufficient training, and do not know enough about HIV and ARV treatments to help support HIV-positive patients [4]. While community health workers in susceptible regions do not receive the same resources as healthcare workers in the Global North (e.g., the US, Canada), critiques of community health workers are qualitative rather than quantitative. The “real” results show quantitative accomplishments, such as a Swaziland study that achieved a 71.4% decrease in HIV-related mortality solely through the Shiselweni Home-based Care (SHBC), a community home-based care establishment program [5].


Overall, the effect that HIV has in Sub-Saharan Africa is a global health challenge that remains unsolved. While the region will never fully recover from HIV’s effects on its population, community-based healthcare HIV-improvement measures are laudable. Without support from local Sub-Saharan African communities and volunteer healthcare workers, improvement would hardly have occurred. Community-based healthcare efforts should be applauded and implemented worldwide, as they are based on the principle of helping one another.


Designed by: Mira Jaafar Reviewed by: Sydney Yen


References 

[1] Moyo, Enos et al. “Key populations and Sub-Saharan Africa's HIV response.” Frontiers in public health vol. 11 1079990. 16 May. 2023, doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1079990.

[2] Mwai, Grace W., et al. "Role and outcomes of community health workers in HIV care in sub‐Saharan Africa: a systematic review." Journal of the International AIDS Society 16.1 (2013): 18586. 

[3] Mermin, Jonathan, et al. "Mortality in HIV-infected Ugandan adults receiving antiretroviral treatment and survival of their HIV-uninfected children: a prospective cohort study." The Lancet 371.9614 (2008): 752-759. 

[4] Ngcobo, Sanele, et al. "Roles, barriers, and recommendations for community health workers providing community-based HIV Care in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review." AIDS Patient Care and STDs 36.4 (2022): 130-144. 

[5] Abdullateef, Ridwanullah Olamide, et al. "Community health workers’ commitment to HIV/AIDS control in Africa." Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health 2 (2024): 100036.


 
 
 

Several cultural groups celebrate holidays that honor fasting rituals. Ramadan, the ninth month of the Islamic calendar, and Yom Kippur, the Jewish holiday of atonement, are two primary examples, typically involving a month of sunrise-to-sunset fasting and a 25-hour fast, respectively [6]. Fasting calls attention to marked moments in the year, bringing communities together in celebration and commemoration. However, while observers of the fast may feel a religious or spiritual impact, they will also feel a biological one. An empty stomach can be uncomfortable for anyone, but what about observers with preexisting medical conditions? What happens when a medical emergency occurs during the fasting period that could be improved by eating? The balance between patient autonomy and doctors’ discretion is always a focal question, but cultural motivations add an additional layer of complexity.


Patients with preexisting medical conditions face unique challenges while fasting. Individuals with cardiovascular disease have a heightened risk of dehydration, which can affect electrolyte balance and put added strain on the heart [3]. Cancer patients have demanding nutritional needs, and fasting can exacerbate the effects of chemotherapy, namely nausea [3]. Diabetes presents an especially intense case. Fasting can trigger extreme changes to blood sugar levels, even leading to diabetic ketoacidosis in some cases for those with type 1 diabetes [3]. A study done in the Middle East even found that instances of renal colic increased after Yom Kippur fasting [7]. 


Complications of this kind can be managed, however, which means that patients don’t necessarily need to abstain from fasting completely. Because religious fasting has a fixed duration and timing, medications can be changed to align with eating schedules [2]. For patients with diabetes, drugs with low hypoglycemic risk can be prioritized and glucose monitoring is strongly encouraged [2]. In order for these accommodations to be made, however, the patient and their doctor must have productive and honest conversations.


Assumptions about each others’ priorities can create unproductive tension between patient and doctor. One study even found evidence that Muslim patients were less likely to go to the doctor during Ramadan when they normally would have because they anticipated that their doctors would advise them against fasting [4]. Patients would rather avoid the interaction altogether than seek the care they need, perhaps out of fatigue from convincing previous doctors of the significance of the fast, or out of fear that they will have to abandon their religious practices. While many variations of Islamic and Jewish teachings do excuse the ill from fasting [1], it is up to the individual to decide whether they practice this or not. If a patient truly wants to fast, they will likely do so with or without their doctor’s guidance [5], so it is crucial that doctors educate themselves on their patients’ religious practices and drug prescriptions so that serious complications do not arise.


Ultimately, the patient has the right to autonomy but the physician also has an obligation to recommend beneficial treatment, so they must find a way to meet in the middle. In order to move forward in the patient’s best interest, treatment should be adjusted to the patient’s needs and religious practices, and this culturally-conscious care should be part of their long-term medical plan. In particular, high-risk patients should be consistently monitored so that if there is an emergency, the physician can take action to protect the patient’s life that is in alignment with the patient’s wishes. The patient should not have to choose between faith and health; medicine can make room for both.


Designed by: Leah Kim Reviewed by: Chloe Quan


References

[1] Alghafli, Z., Hatch, T., Rose, A., Abo-Zena, M., Marks, L., & Dollahite, D. (2019). A Qualitative Study of Ramadan: A Month of Fasting, Family, and Faith. Religions, 10(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020123 

[2] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. (2024). 5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025. Diabetes Care, 48(Supplement_1), S86–S127. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-S005 

[3] Blogs & News. (2026). Doctors at Kaiser Permanente in MD, VA, DC. https://mydoctor.kaiserpermanente.org/mas/news/fasting-during-ramadan-with-health-conditions-2944846 

[4] Ilkilic, I., & Ertin, H. (2017). Ethical conflicts in the treatment of fasting Muslim patients with diabetes during Ramadan. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 20(4), 561–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9777-y 

[5] Fasting Safely with Diabetes | NIDDK. (2020, August 26). National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/professionals/diabetes-discoveries-practice/fasting-safely-with-diabetes 

[6] Congress, W. J. (n.d.). World Jewish Congress. World Jewish Congress. Retrieved October 1, 2026, from https://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/the-muslim-ramadan-and-the-jewish-yom-kippur 

[7] Zilberman, D. E., Drori, T., Shvero, A., Mor, Y., Winkler, H. Z., & Kleinmann, N. (2021). A single day fasting may increase emergency room visits due to renal colic. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86254-7 


 
 
 

DMEJ

   Duke Medical Ethics Journal   

bottom of page